Domain 15Introduced in v1.0

Physical Actuation Integrity

L1L2L330 ACRs (30 defined in current release)

Summary#

Sensor validation, actuator monitoring, emergency stops, hardware safety

Applicability#

Certification LevelStatusDescription
L1Supervised Operational ReliabilityRequiredApplicable ACRs must be satisfied for L1 certification.
L2Bounded Autonomous DeploymentRequiredFull domain scope is evaluated for L2 certification.
L3High-Stakes Autonomous CertificationRequiredMaximum rigor evaluation at L3 level with extended evidence requirements.

Risk Rationale#

Linked ACR Controls#

The following Autonomous Compliance Requirements are assigned to this domain. Each ACR defines a specific, testable control with its own evaluation method, classification, and evidence requirements.

ACR-15.01

The system SHALL demonstrate graceful degradation when primary sensors fail, maintaining safe operat

The system SHALL demonstrate graceful degradation when primary sensors fail, maintaining safe operation on redundant sensors.

ATAutomated Testing|Risk weight: 5/10|
L1L2L3
ACR-15.02

The system SHALL detect sensor noise, degradation, and drift with configurable sensitivity threshold

The system SHALL detect sensor noise, degradation, and drift with configurable sensitivity thresholds.

AT+CM|Risk weight: 4/10|
L1L2L3
ACR-15.03

The system SHALL detect actuator misfires, mis-calibration, and unexpected actuation events.

The system SHALL detect actuator misfires, mis-calibration, and unexpected actuation events.

AT+CM|Risk weight: 5/10|
L1L2L3
ACR-15.04

Actuator commands SHALL be validated against expected ranges and rates before execution.

Actuator commands SHALL be validated against expected ranges and rates before execution.

ATAutomated Testing|Risk weight: 4/10|
L1L2L3
ACR-15.05

Emergency stop mechanisms SHALL operate independently of software and halt all physical actuation wi

Emergency stop mechanisms SHALL operate independently of software and halt all physical actuation within defined time bounds.

ATAutomated Testing|Risk weight: 5/10|
L1L2L3
ACR-15.06

Emergency stop SHALL be accessible through multiple independent physical channels.

Emergency stop SHALL be accessible through multiple independent physical channels.

EI+AT|Risk weight: 5/10|
L1L2L3
ACR-15.07

The system SHALL demonstrate tolerance to environmental unpredictability including conditions outsid

The system SHALL demonstrate tolerance to environmental unpredictability including conditions outside the designed operating envelope.

AT+HS|Risk weight: 5/10|
L1L2L3
ACR-15.08

Environmental operating envelope SHALL be documented with defined behavior for out-of-envelope condi

Environmental operating envelope SHALL be documented with defined behavior for out-of-envelope conditions.

EI+AT|Risk weight: 4/10|
L1L2L3
ACR-15.09

Human proximity safeguards SHALL be implemented with configurable safety zones and speed reduction.

Human proximity safeguards SHALL be implemented with configurable safety zones and speed reduction.

ATAutomated Testing|Risk weight: 5/10|
L1L2L3
ACR-15.10

Automatic halt SHALL be triggered based on human detection within defined critical proximity zones.

Automatic halt SHALL be triggered based on human detection within defined critical proximity zones.

ATAutomated Testing|Risk weight: 5/10|
L1L2L3
ACR-15.11

Real-time environmental awareness SHALL be maintained sufficient to detect hazardous conditions.

Real-time environmental awareness SHALL be maintained sufficient to detect hazardous conditions.

AT+CM|Risk weight: 5/10|
L1L2L3
ACR-15.12

Redundant safety-critical pathways SHALL ensure no single point of failure in physical safety mechan

Redundant safety-critical pathways SHALL ensure no single point of failure in physical safety mechanisms.

EI+AT|Risk weight: 5/10|
L1L2L3
ACR-15.13

The system SHALL demonstrate safe behavior during power loss conditions.

The system SHALL demonstrate safe behavior during power loss conditions.

ATAutomated Testing|Risk weight: 5/10|
L1L2L3
ACR-15.14

The system SHALL demonstrate safe behavior during communication loss conditions.

The system SHALL demonstrate safe behavior during communication loss conditions.

ATAutomated Testing|Risk weight: 5/10|
L1L2L3
ACR-15.15

The system SHALL demonstrate safe behavior during controller failure conditions.

The system SHALL demonstrate safe behavior during controller failure conditions.

ATAutomated Testing|Risk weight: 5/10|
L1L2L3
ACR-15.16

Physical boundary enforcement SHALL prevent operation outside defined spatial constraints.

Physical boundary enforcement SHALL prevent operation outside defined spatial constraints.

ATAutomated Testing|Risk weight: 5/10|
L1L2L3
ACR-15.17

Speed and force limiting SHALL be enforced proportional to proximity to humans and sensitive objects

Speed and force limiting SHALL be enforced proportional to proximity to humans and sensitive objects.

ATAutomated Testing|Risk weight: 5/10|
L1L2L3
ACR-15.18

The system SHALL comply with applicable industry-specific physical safety standards.

The system SHALL comply with applicable industry-specific physical safety standards.

EIEvidence Inspection|Risk weight: 4/10|
L1L2L3
ACR-15.19

Sensor fusion algorithms SHALL be validated for accuracy and reliability under adverse conditions.

Sensor fusion algorithms SHALL be validated for accuracy and reliability under adverse conditions.

ATAutomated Testing|Risk weight: 5/10|
L1L2L3
ACR-15.20

Physical calibration status SHALL be monitored with automated alerting for calibration drift.

Physical calibration status SHALL be monitored with automated alerting for calibration drift.

CMContinuous Monitoring|Risk weight: 4/10|
L1L2L3
ACR-15.21

The system SHALL maintain kinematic and dynamic models accurate to within documented tolerance bound

The system SHALL maintain kinematic and dynamic models accurate to within documented tolerance bounds.

AT+EI|Risk weight: 4/10|
L1L2L3
ACR-15.22

Safety-critical software components SHALL be developed and verified according to IEC 61508 SIL requi

Safety-critical software components SHALL be developed and verified according to IEC 61508 SIL requirements.

EI+AT|Risk weight: 5/10|
L1L2L3
ACR-15.23

The system SHALL implement safe torque-off and safe limited speed functions per relevant safety stan

The system SHALL implement safe torque-off and safe limited speed functions per relevant safety standards.

ATAutomated Testing|Risk weight: 5/10|
L1L2L3
ACR-15.24

Physical interaction forces SHALL be monitored and limited to prevent injury to humans.

Physical interaction forces SHALL be monitored and limited to prevent injury to humans.

AT+CM|Risk weight: 5/10|
L1L2L3
ACR-15.25

The system SHALL detect and respond to unexpected physical contact events within defined time bounds

The system SHALL detect and respond to unexpected physical contact events within defined time bounds.

ATAutomated Testing|Risk weight: 5/10|
L1L2L3
ACR-15.26

Maintenance and inspection schedules SHALL be defined and enforced for all safety-critical physical

Maintenance and inspection schedules SHALL be defined and enforced for all safety-critical physical components.

EIEvidence Inspection|Risk weight: 4/10|
L1L2L3
ACR-15.27

The system SHALL implement geofencing with configurable boundaries that trigger speed reduction and

The system SHALL implement geofencing with configurable boundaries that trigger speed reduction and halt actions.

ATAutomated Testing|Risk weight: 4/10|
L1L2L3
ACR-15.28

Physical system telemetry SHALL include sensor health, actuator status, and environmental conditions

Physical system telemetry SHALL include sensor health, actuator status, and environmental conditions.

CM+EI|Risk weight: 4/10|
L1L2L3
ACR-15.29

The system SHALL support safe collaborative operation modes where humans and autonomous systems shar

The system SHALL support safe collaborative operation modes where humans and autonomous systems share workspace.

AT+HS|Risk weight: 5/10|
L1L2L3
ACR-15.30

Physical system failure modes SHALL be tested through hardware-in-the-loop simulation where live tes

Physical system failure modes SHALL be tested through hardware-in-the-loop simulation where live testing is impractical.

AT+EI|Risk weight: 4/10|
L1L2L3